• Greenpro Capital Corp. (NASDAQ:GRNQ) faces significant challenges with a ROIC of -24.25% compared to its WACC of 11.57%, indicating inefficiencies in generating sufficient returns.
• Senmiao Technology Limited (NASDAQ:AIHS) exhibits a more concerning scenario with a ROIC of -622.64% against a WACC of 7.78%, highlighting severe capital utilization issues.
• Farmmi, Inc. (NASDAQ:FAMI) and Oxbridge Re Holdings Limited (NASDAQ:OXBR) also show negative ROIC figures, but Farmmi's closer-to-neutral ROIC to WACC ratio suggests relatively better capital efficiency.

Greenpro Capital Corp. (NASDAQ:GRNQ) is a company that provides financial services, including business consulting and corporate advisory services. It operates primarily in the Asia-Pacific region, focusing on helping businesses with cross-border operations. In the competitive landscape, Greenpro faces peers like Senmiao Technology Limited, Farmmi, Inc., and Oxbridge Re Holdings Limited, each with varying degrees of capital efficiency.

Greenpro's Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is -24.25%, which is significantly lower than its Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) of 11.57%. This negative ROIC indicates that Greenpro is not generating enough returns to cover its cost of capital, a critical metric for investors assessing the company's financial health.

In comparison, Senmiao Technology Limited (NASDAQ:AIHS) has an even more concerning ROIC of -622.64% against a WACC of 7.78%. This vast discrepancy highlights severe inefficiencies in how Senmiao utilizes its capital, making it less attractive to investors seeking efficient capital use.

Farmmi, Inc. (NASDAQ:FAMI) presents a slightly better picture with an ROIC of -0.44% and a WACC of 11.53%. Although still negative, Farmmi's ROIC to WACC ratio of -0.038 is the least negative among its peers, suggesting it is closer to covering its cost of capital, which may appeal to investors looking for relatively better capital efficiency.

Oxbridge Re Holdings Limited (NASDAQ:OXBR) also struggles with a negative ROIC of -40.06% compared to its WACC of 13.47%. This indicates inefficiencies in generating returns on its capital, similar to Greenpro and Senmiao, but not as severe as Senmiao's situation. Investors should consider these metrics when evaluating potential investment opportunities.